The Star Mass Project--Results Table


All spectral types are luminosity class V (main sequence).


SpectrumMassp.e.N
O338.391419.55436
O3.553.00007.00001
O526.44229.39933
O5.530.40097.88755
O625.36648.18475
O6.525.72584.50782
O725.76165.468011
O7.514.43441.08446
O819.26850.88925
O917.17432.51554
O9.516.63830.59469
O9.817.72580.00232
B014.08230.552411
B0.213.73000.05001
B0.512.58810.331611
B19.75020.270523
B1.512.24620.11994
B28.27630.315420
B2.56.00820.02966
B35.31760.04745
B45.12960.03016
B4.54.09000.05001
B54.94270.615917
B64.22640.04143
B6.53.36000.14001
B74.06950.02156
B83.01160.039914
B8.52.57700.09801
B92.49880.025519
B9.52.35490.009819
A02.12650.009016
A12.25530.006213
A1.52.01700.08401
A22.12630.008923
A31.99350.005614
A41.94450.002311
A51.84890.006414
A61.70680.004013
A71.57170.001519
A81.63940.001713
A91.67510.17277
F01.52890.001931
F11.58790.00139
F21.43320.002423
F31.41770.000517
F41.36310.00209
F51.29960.000853
F5.51.08950.00042
F61.33480.000330
F71.36630.001318
F81.16740.000932
F8.51.11000.05001
F91.12830.000220
F9.51.05610.00094
G01.09380.000120
G11.07310.000814
G1.50.79100.00301
G21.00000.000014
G2.51.06290.00062
G31.03920.000213
G41.09280.00054
G4.50.99000.19001
G50.99090.000912
G60.99840.00186
G6.50.96000.15001
G70.91380.00014
G80.96390.000212
G90.90550.00326
K00.84490.000415
K10.87650.00066
K20.82420.000414
K30.80140.000813
K40.75420.000310
K4.50.62100.05801
K50.72200.001311
K60.66440.000211
K70.69230.000913
K7.50.52000.13001
K80.58280.00023
K90.66200.00501
M00.54550.00066
M0.50.56770.00173
M10.56060.000215
M1.50.53690.00013
M20.47790.00028
M2.50.50160.00049
M30.27020.000324
M3.50.35020.000217
M40.30110.000217
M4.30.19400.00031
M4.30.20980.00141
M4.50.21680.000214
M50.16160.000228
M5.50.19350.00027
M60.14910.000111
M70.09270.00005
M7.50.09500.00401
M80.08470.000014
M8.50.08310.00014
M90.08560.00013
M9.50.08380.00002
L00.07940.00004
L10.07600.01401
L1.50.07500.00002


Masses are graphed against spectral class index below:


Mass versus Spectral Class Index

Note how uneven this is. This is not a smooth progression, but it probably is in nature.

For a while I was showing a separate graph of the above data with a second-degree Loess smooth added. However, as more and more points accumulate, the smoothed line deviates more and more from the actual data points. I'm going to have to give up the hopes I had pinned on the loess smooth for eventually compiling my table. It has the desirable property of providing a monotic decrease in mass as spectral type goes from early to late, but it just isn't close enough to the data. A moving average doesn't work badly, but it isn't monotonic, so that's out as well.

I was also graphing mean relative absolute deviation for all groups with the same number of cases--the deviations being measured from the Loess smooth. That goes out the window too. But here's a graph of the mean probable error versus number of cases:


Mean Probable Error versus Number of Cases

As of 04/17/2022, all spectral types with 30 or more mass figures available are:

The average for the whole database, so far, is 9.9 star masses found per spectral type. Note how, as of this date, all the best values are of spectral class F. This apparently hits the sweet spot between the rarity of type O at the early end of the sequence and the dimness of types M and L at the late end. Note, though, how an F5V star appears to be less massive than an F6 star. This is undoubtedly an artifact of sampling error, showing that this project still has a long way to go.

(Figures in red are updated with each acquisition of new data and subsequent reanalysis.)



Page created:02/24/2022
Last modified:  04/22/2025
Author:BPL