(c) 2025 by Barton Paul Levenson
Humans are not apes. Usually, when I say this, I am immediately accused of being a creationist or a "human chauvinist." Neither is correct. My thesis is that humans have enough important differences from great apes as to rate a different taxon. The "cladists" prefer that descent alone should generate taxa. There is something to be said for that, but I maintain that anatomy, psychology, and behavior should also be considered.
It is clear that humans are closely related to apes. But they are not the same thing. Similarly, a dog is not a wolf. A duck is not a chicken. An alligator is not a crocodile. Very similar, shared ancestors, yes. The same thing, no.
Here is a list of differences between humans and apes. I would say #7 is the most important, but all eleven points of difference are meaningful.
I am not a biologist. I have a longstanding interest in evolutionary biology and primatology, and have taken one physical anthropology course, but that's not the same as having studied it in depth. Professional biologists may have reasons why the thesis outlined here is wrong. But until I see a meaningful argument to that effect, I will continue to maintain that humans and apes are two different types of animal. Pigeonholing me as a creationist is not a meaningful argument.
| Page created: | 09/12/2025 |
| Last modified: | 10/15/2025 |
| Author: | BPL |